They went to the moon, but forgot to take off the lens caps...
Working on my comics today i had a good laugh. I work with media playing in the background usually, today I watched The Passionate Eye's [CBC] presentation of a mock doc about the faking of the moon landing, caled Dark side of the moon. Perfect!
- "How could the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon? During an interview with Stanley Kubrick's widow an extraordinary story came to light. She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. win the high stakes race to the moon. In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn't afford any expensive public relations failures. Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, whose 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968) had provided much inspiration, to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn't be missed. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). A subtle blend of facts, fiction and hypothesis around the first landing on the moon, Dark Side Of The Moon illustrates how the truth can be twisted by the manipulation of images.
With use of 'hijacked' archival footage, false documents, real interviews taken out of context or transformed through voice-over or dubbing, staged interviews, as well as, interviews with astronauts like Buzz Aldrin and others, Dark Side Of The Moon navigates the viewer through lies and truth; fact and fiction. This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that one should always view television with a critical eye."
its a great satirical take on both the conspiracy theory itself, the media, and a prank for viewers who don’t watch critically and take this shite too seriously. It has just enough fact to it to come off as plausible fiction, like so many conspiracy theories.
Its funny. I wonder how many of the interviewees were interviewed specifically for it, seems like, from the credit sequence, a good number where in on the gag.
So, to give the basic plot, NASA & the Pentagon starts the space race to develop ICB missile tec – this is basically true – but they are also very aware of the need for a positive media spin and public approval to allow for the gross expenditures of money it takes to do it. So the decide they need to cover their asses, and make sure that if the moon landing fails, they have a happy ending pre-shot to feed the public. Apparently Kubric is contacted because of his history with NASA from producing 2001, a film partly meant as a PR vehicle for the space program – this is also basically true as I recall, NASA did work with him to help excite the public about the space program.
But here he’s supposed to have helped them despite misgivings to fake the moon footage with a secret CIA crew on the set of 2001 just after they finished up main production of the shoot. By the way, even this foe-Doc says they landed on the moon, just that they faked the photos cus’ the cameras didn't work in the extreme temperatures. Sweet twist. All goes well and Kubric earns himself a great mob style debt with NASA, which is supposed to explain the way he got use of a special one of a kind Zeiss lens used to shoot Barry Lindon.
There is the great joke line from a supposedly insane CIA man hiding out in NY Jewish community, he calls himself a 'Acidic Jew', I’m going to have to adopt that one for myself :) from now on I am officially an Acidic Jew. ….and later in the credits the rabbi says, looking up from reading his script for his ‘interview’, “this acidic Jew joke doesn’t work in Hebrew” [he’s talking in Hebrew] Perfect.
Good watch. You can find it at some of them torrent sites I believe, if you go looking around for it.
For the record, if you do watch the real moon footage, nothing you see really defies physics at all. The flag, flaps, marks in the dust, the stars or lack of them, any of it. Only wacky toons and hard core sceptics too willing to believe them ever assert that they do.
posted by max at Wednesday, August 17, 2005


2 Comments:
Little hard to beleive that the U.S. Govt. would hire the maker of "Doctor Strangelove," or that he would do anything for them to help prop up the Cold War.
And 2001 had a coverup conspiracy in the story, anyhow.
They do a good job of making it work in the film actually, until they start sticking their tongue out and being obvious about the gag.
Post a Comment
<< Home